Skip to content
TheTranscendenceDiaries

TheTranscendenceDiaries

Thoughtful musings for the unabashedly aware and ravenously curious intellectual and intelligentsia

  • About the Transcendence Diaries
  • About the Author
  • Subscribe or Donate
  • The Transcendence Manifesto
  • Ed Hale News
  • Videos
TheTranscendenceDiaries

Tag: ronald reagan

What’s Happening In Iran & Why It Is So Important

October 8, 2022
Video: What’s Happening In Iran Right Now & Why It Is So Important – Part One: The History
Video: What’s Happening In Iran Right Now and Why It Is So Important – Part Two: What I Learned While In Iran

The last two weeks have been incredible, both inspiring and heartbreaking, for the country and people of Iran and the implications of what a true Democratic Iranian Revolution would mean for the world.

We spent the last week creating a video (that we’ve now split into two parts) to help explain what’s happening in Iran right now in the bigger context of their history and who they are as a people, hoping to increase understanding of the Iranian people, their long, rich history and why these current protests are so vital, not just to the brave women and men on the frontlines in the streets, but also for world peace.

We believe what we are witnessing in Iran right now is historic. We know we are personally taking a big risk by posting the videos due to their openness & honesty, and it is something we are still actively discussing. But we also sincerely believe that our brave friends in Iran deserve all the attention & support they can get, including a real world understanding of who they are & what they’re fighting for. Freedom Justice Equality & basic human rights.

If you have any questions or desire to get more involved to support the cause please feel free to reach out. Together we can. – Ed Hale

Like this:

Like Loading...
Activism, Current Events, Human Rights, Iran 1979, 2022, affair, Ajax, ayatollah Khamenei, civilian diplomacy, ed hale, Iran, Iran 1953 coup d’etat, Iran protests, Iran Revolution, Iran-Contra, Iraq, Islamic republic, Islamic Revolution, Israel, Khamenei, Mahsa Amini, mosadegh, Oliver North, ronald reagan, Rumsfeld, Sadaam Hussein, Sandanistas, track two diplomacy, visiting Iran

What the United States Government Doesn’t Say About Iran

September 17, 2019

Just did a refresher study on the exile and last year of the (second) shah of Iran. Was specifically interested in it’s effects on U.S. relations and global stability then and now.

As we already know, Great Britain and the the United States through the CIA with a little help from France perpetrate a coup d’etat in 1953 to topple the democratically elected prime minister of Iran, who had run on a platform of not giving away Iranian oil to Great Britain at below market costs anymore. These three western powers then reinstall the Shah of Iran’s son into power and reinstate monarchic rule in iran. Just what the Iranian people wanted. NOT. Great Britain, France and the US form a new big oil conglomerate from all this free oil they’re about to come into and call it BP, British Petroleum. In exchange they will prop up and support the monarchy in Iran militarily against the wishes of the people and keep down any revolts.

And so begins a renewed relatively stable alliance between Iran and western nations. Iran becomes more and more westernized. Brits move there in droves to run the oil plants. Iranian kids go to British schools and learn English. Highways and streets in Tehran are renamed Eisenhower Boulevard and Kennedy Street.

After a few decades of watching the so called “royals”, elites and western nations blow through all their wealth and natural resources the Iranian people begin to get angry. Like revolution angry. It’s the 1970s. The situation is not helped by the fact that a well educated and well spoken radical Islamic cleric named Khomeini is constantly preaching revolution from exile in France, encouraging the people to rise up against western domination. Protests in the streets begin, calling for an “end to control by America”.

In the late 70s, the presidents of the United States, Great Britain, France and Germany secretly meet in Guadalupe to discuss what they’re going to do about the Shah because their oil contracts are soon to expire and they don’t want to start paying more. Do they depose the Shah? Take him out? Support him and squash the protests and use their support to bargain their prices low for another 50 years? Before they can decide they’re informed that the Shah has cancer from one of their informants. Ah hah! Perfect! Let’s not support him during these turbulent times, we’ll force him into exile and put someone else in power who will give us even more control and lower oil prices.

It’s getting dangerous for the Shah now. He calls his US and British allies to ask for help and they inform him they won’t be able to help him. He should leave if he has to. So he does. First to Egypt. Then Morocco. Then the Bahamas. Then Mexico. By now Khomeini has returned to Iran as a revolutionary hero. Promising an end to monarchy, western rule and a return to democracy. He very quickly kills everyone ever employed by the shah’s government and names himself Supreme Leader for Life. He obviously had watched Star Wars one too many times.

By now the Shah is very sick. In his defense, US president Carter, though he ruthlessly betrayed his ally for his country’s selfish gain, did want to help the Shah in his illness. But the Iranian people were not going to tolerate the US harboring the Shah, healing his illness and then reinstating him again in a year or two. So they stormed the American embassy in Tehran and took a bunch of American hostages and demanded the Shah return to face trial and a return of all the Iranian assets that the Federal Reserve, the US Treasury, American banks and American corporations had seized during the protests. (Some of this money was eventually returned to Iran by US president Barack Obama 40 years later, who also acknowledged and apologized for the 1953 coup, which is what created the current mess the Iranian people are still in today.)

President Carter at this point just wants those American hostages back. He realizes he made a huge mistake by ousting the Shah and allowing this Islamic cleric Khomeini to waltz in and take over Iran. But he cant get enough of his colleagues to agree to give Iran all their assets back. So the hostages are stuck as pawns there in a dangerous political game. The Rockefellers, who are holding billions of Iranian assets in their banks, don’t want to let go of all that money but they do offer to provide doctors and medical support to try to save the Shah’s life. So they secretly fly him to New York. An operation is performed. It’s botched. He gets sicker. They then become fearful the American hostages will be endangered if they continue to help the Shah. So they fly him to Texas and then force him on Panama, using the recently completed Panama Canal deal as a bargaining chip. But Panama too is afraid of retaliation by this crazy mad Khomeini. So they cut a secret deal with Khomeini to extradite the Shah back to Iran to stand trial and be executed.

But Egypt’s Sadat swoops In to rescue his old friend and offers him sanctuary in Egypt. So off they fly to Egypt. The Carter administration calls Khomeini and says “we’ve put the Shah on a CIA plane to Egypt. We’ll trade you the Shah for our hostages. Do what you want with him.” Obviously getting cheap oil is no longer a priority. And neither is loyalty to longtime allies.

The US suddenly brings the plane down on some Portuguese islands in order to secretly hand the Shah over to Iran without telling him (they tell him they have to refuel. They dont), but Khomeini doesn’t trust the U.S. so the deal gets broken at the last minute. The Shah ends up back in Egypt. He very soon dies from complications from his botched American surgeries. The Ayatollah Khomeini does eventually release the American hostages but waits to do it until Carter is ousted from Washington just to twist the knife a little and make his point clear.

He believes he may have found at least a frenemy in new US president Ronald Reagan, who very soon will militarily and financially support a newly American installed ruthless dictator in Iraq named Hussein who is immediately and secretly ordered by the US to attack and overtake Iran. Which he does. In the 8 year Iran-Iraq war. Of course, Reagan, not wanting to play favorites also secretly supports Iran by supplying them with weapons of war to kill the Iraqis, assuming that no matter who wins they’ll just become their ally and help them get rid of the other guy. They both have plenty of oil after all.

Eventually this plan backfires as both countries begin to realize that neither of them want to be subservient lapdogs of the wicked western imperialists. The US eventually takes Iraq out 20 years later. Along with a few other pesky Muslim nations. Only Iran remains, steadfast in their desire for self deterministic rule and autonomy, albeit under excruciatingly unhappy circumstances under a brutal authoritarian rule.

There’s more to the story. There always is. But it all goes back to ‘53 and ‘79. American greed, selfishness,

very poor judgment and ill advised strategy. And here we all are. Happy days.

Like this:

Like Loading...
Alternative History, American Terrorism, Current Events, Human Rights, Politics and Government, Terrorism 1953, American hostage crisis, American imperialism, Ayatollah Khomeini, Barack Obama, BP, British petroleum, CIA, coup d'etat, egypt, Iran, Iran Contra Affair, Iran Iraq war, Iranian revolution, Iraq, mosadegh, president Carter, Reza Shah, ronald reagan, Saddam Hussein, Shah of Iran

Powerful Lessons from the Life of Nelson Mandela the Terrorist

December 8, 2013

There are plenty of lessons to learn from the life of former South African president and activist Nelson Mandela. Hundreds if not thousands of books have been written about him over the years. More big budget Hollywood movies are sure to come. Anything and everything that can be said about a man has been said about the 95 year old Nobel Peace Prize winning Mandela over the last three decades, especially this week in the wake of his passing. Open a newspaper, turn on the TV or log onto the internet and, besides football, one will find it difficult to find any other subject being discussed as readily. So what more is there to say? Especially anything new or noteworthy.

Since the aspect of memorializing and paying tribute to the man and his legacy is already being well played all over the world, if not over played, let us instead turn our attention to aspects of the story that are being more or less ignored. Perhaps there are more powerful lessons to be gleaned than the usual “patience forgiveness and perseverance eventually pay off and lead to transformation” one that we are currently hearing so much of this week. For there is more to the story.

Many of us younger than the Baby Boomer generation simply remember Nelson Mandela as a heroic figure of some kind, at times seeming mythic in stature; right up there with Martin Luther King or Mahatma Gandhi. We know he was in prison for a long time and somehow managed to survive. We know he was eventually freed and became president of a country that was ruled by colonial white powers for generations. We know he was a civil rights activist against modern day apartheid, the term used to describe racial prejudice and segregation by minority whites against blacks in the country called South Africa. We recognize his face as being synonymous with patience, forgiveness, racial equality and activism. And for most of us that’s where the story begins and ends. Even if that were the entirety of the story it would still qualify as a powerful legacy and a valuable example by which to live.

But in addition to these well known aspects of the Nelson Mandela story are more subtle and perhaps more profound lessons. The one that possibly engages the most is the fact that for decades Nelson Mandela was considered a villain by The United States and the West in general throughout most of the time he rotted away in a South African prison. He was branded a communist agitator and considered a terrorist, a fact that was commonly known and agreed on by the majority of Americans, and placed on America’s Terrorist List, where he stayed for forty years, until 2008; a fact called “an embarrassing inconvenience” by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice when Mandela attempted to enter the United States during the George W. Bush presidency. One can only imagine the level of irony and embarrassment felt by Rice, an African American herself who benefitted greatly from the Civil Rights movement in the United States as she was forced to deal with this “inconvenience”.

At this point in our shared history, the myth making phase of the Mandela legend has long since begun. Now that he has passed the political sycophants of the world will begin the real glory-grabbing as they start announcing official Nelson Mandela Days in their town, state or country, erecting Nelson Mandela memorials, building statues and probably even whole museums in his name; all will qualify for free federal grant money from the tax payers. And this is only the beginning. Along the way sometimes such endeavors also require a good deal of redaction, cover ups and historical revision. Just as Martin Luther King was considered a terrorist threat and constantly harassed and badgered by the United States government — who now begrudgingly admit that they had even gone so far as bugging his house and wiretapping his office and home telephones for years, so too was Nelson Mandela. This is the America that the few the proud the not-Marines know and don’t particularly love. The grand irony is not that they took these actions against these men. If history is any indication, that’s been their job since the country was first formed, to bring down anyone who challenges or resists the status quo, no matter how unjust or unfair it might be.

The fact that historical facts have been leading scholars to believe for decades now that the assassination story associated with the death of MLK was most likely a fabricated one and that certain branches of both the local and federal government were involved in his murder is largely taken for granted by many, especially the family of Dr. King, who sued the United States government several times in court to reopen the investigation into his death in order to exonerate the name of and free the alleged lone gun assassin James Earl Ray.

This is all business as usual stuff for the United States government. But it’s not ironic. It’s just too plain old ordinary to be. The real irony lies in the complete about-face the government takes once circumstances change so profoundly against their will that they are forced to begin to revise their stance and pretend they never held it. Such was the case with their blatantly hostile view and treatment of Martin Luther King and as well with Nelson Mandela. And therein lay a lesson that is just as profound as the more obvious ones being pointed out ad nauseum by pastors, politicians and the mainstream media all over the country today. There are lessons here that if integrated properly can be used in our future to further speed along our evolution to a more civilized, honest and enlightened society.

We must remember that even though Mandela has been propped up on a celestial pedestal now and paraded around political theatres and social circles for years as a legendary activist to the point of near sainthood by American politicians, he spent 27 years of his life behind bars in prison in South Africa, an action that was fully supported by the same United States government. It wasn’t that the United States “just didn’t want to get involved” in the politics and policies of a foreign sovereign state (since when has the United States been known to ever take that stance?), imprisoning Mandela and his comrades in the ANC (African National Congress) as well as the official racist apartheid laws of South Africa were supported and assisted by the U.S. government. Throughout the presidencies of Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan and then Bush Sr. the white-minority controlled South Africa was a major trade partner of the United States, in commodities such as minerals, diamonds, gold and uranium. They fought alongside the United States in its various foreign exploitive wars and vice versa. President Nixon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger were all too happy to assist the South African government in brandishing Mandela “a communist terrorist threat to the ideals of liberty and democracy.” So too were Ronald Reagan and the United Kingdom’s Margaret Thatcher.

In the 1980s celebrities around the world began to stand up and speak out against South African apartheid — (sometimes one wishes that people would just call it what it was, flat out self-serving racism, discrimination and segregation of an entire race of people based purely on the color of their skin, so as not to potentiate any misunderstanding of how brutal and oppressive a law and practice it was). As always it was the artists and entertainers of the world who first took up the torch for this blatantly obvious human rights abuse,  (but notably many years AFTER the real heroes of these issues — the activists, who almost always rise up long before anyone else has the knowledge or courage to do so in civil societies). This eventually led to the U.S. congress drafting a strong sanctions bill against doing any business or trade with the government of South Africa in the mid-eighties until they did away with their apartheid government. The bill passed. President Reagan vetoed it. His views were strictly Cold War anti-communist, human rights be damned. He also didn’t want to lose the valuable trade relationship the United States had with South Africa.

The Congress, to their credit, pushed the bill into law anyway. In the meantime, president Reagan promoted the idea that the real problem wasn’t racism by whites but tribal conflicts amongst blacks that was the true cause of the suffering of the South African black people. Where have we heard that argument before?

None of these facts are secret or disputed or conspiratorial in nature. They’re well known to anyone who was alive and old enough to be aware of the world around them at the time that they occurred. Even though we may not be. Anyone over the age of 45 to 50 can easily remember the names Nelson Mandela and the ANC being commonly known as renegades, communists and terrorist threats to be feared, subdued and put down by “lovers of Western liberty and democracy”. Just as Islamists are in today’s world. It’s ironic that these same powers are now taking every advantage possible to tout the merits of the man and his mission and publicly drool over his legacy as if he were the black Jesus. But irony aside, how can this knowledge serve us now?

I have always contended that a knowledge of history is useless if it’s not brought forward and used to better gauge and inform our views and actions in the present. Knowing what we now know about Nelson Mandela — how he was viewed and treated by the United States and other Western governments, what areas of the world or social and political figures of today are bound to be relegated to similar changes of viewpoints and about-faces by the powers that be? What horrors are we currently supporting or permitting that we will later regret as a nation so much so that we will feel compelled to not only change our views but attempt to cover up our former ideals and actions? Where is there blatant ignorance malfeasance or injustice being committed in our name simply because we as a people are too lazy or too afraid to stand up for what we believe in?

As Meet the Press, Face the Nation, 60 Minutes, CNN, the White House and every other corporate lapdog step over each other in a mad dash to be the first seen gloating with admiration over Nelson Mandela and his indomitable spirit of rebellion and passion for change and human rights, these are the questions that we should instead be asking; because THIS seems to be the real meat of the Nelson Mandela legacy, the most profound lesson in the now and moving forward; and perhaps the best way to honor the man at the moment of his passing. At the very least, it seems to be the one lesson that we might have the most to learn from in terms of ideas that haven’t been fully or properly addressed yet.

Who are we overtly branding a threat or a terrorist and suppressing NOW?

Iran comes to mind — which is ironic since almost all of the real wickedness perpetrated in the world in regards to Iran over the last 100 years has been taken by Western Nations against Iran, not by Iran. One day, when or if history eventually rights itself, the Islamic Revolution that took place in Iran in 1979, though not perfect, will be viewed as it is in Iran itself: a momentous people’s revolution where the people of Iran took the country back and got rid of the foreign occupiers (the United States and Great Britain) and acted valiantly and bravely during the American Hostage Crisis by not killing ONE American citizen. All they were asking for was their former king/dictator Shah Palavi to be returned to them so he could stand trial in a court of law for his nearly constant abuse of powers and illegal activities. The United States refused to comply with their request. Even though it was their country.

[As this is a very nuanced, detailed and muddled subject, it is difficult for anyone objectively minded to take a stand on this one particular issue. On the one hand the United States government was defying the will of a sovereign people once again, placing  their own will above that of the people of this foreign country. Which they clearly had no business doing. Such is the very nature of the United States of America and the reason why the country is so questioned and reviled by intellectuals on all sides of the fence as well as true lovers of human rights and freedom. On the other hand the United States government, along with Great Britain, was the entity responsible for placing the Shah back in power in Iran in the first place — completely against the will of the Iranian people, and surely felt a certain amount of loyalty and responsibility towards the Shah. They knew that if they handed him over to the Iranian people that he would most likely be put on trial, found guilty and be put to death. It didn’t hurt that he had more than enough money to compensate the powers that be in Washington and elsewhere in order to assure he would not be extradited back to Iran to stand trial. Tricky stuff. But the moral of the story is obvious: The United States should have never gotten illegally involved in the affairs of Iran in the first place, period.]

The fact that the Iranian people showed such discipline and commitment to their religious values and restraint by not killing any of the Americans they took hostage speaks volumes about the difference between them and their American foes. It also speaks to what is currently happening in respect to Iran as it is being uniformly demonized, especially by Western nations and Israel, for wanting to build a nuclear energy program for itself as it projects that it will be completely out of oil by the year 2020. The United States and Israel most notably, along with Saudi controlled Arabia, do not “want” Iran to have a nuclear energy program for fear that they will escalate the program to eventually make nuclear weapons, which could “offset the balance of power in the Middle East”. What this really means is that Iran will once and for all be in full control of their fate as a sovereign nation as opposed to being in constant fear of the more powerful countries of Israel and the United States who both have nuclear weapons.

This too is a tricky subject; one which we have already shed gallons of ink on over the last five years. It is more than ironic that the country telling the world that “a nuclear armed Iran poses a real and imminent threat to the entire world” happens to be the only country in the history of human civilization who have ever used nuclear weapons to obliterate other people, i.e. the United States. At the same time, it is true that Iran has been known to sponsor various “terrorist organizations” around the Middle East such as Hamas and Hezbola. This is a valid concern. A frightening reality.

At the same time there are more Jewish people living in Iran than in any other country in the Middle East except for Israel because they are free to practice their religion as they always have been since King Cyrus the Great freed them in ancient times as is relayed in the Old Testament. Iran is NOT anti Jewish, as much as some may try to distort that reality. Instead they are anti-Zionism. They are against foreign invaders entering a land by force, taking over the towns and villages until they eventually gain control over much of the entire country, and systematically killing its people just because they have access to more money, more influence and more weapons than the inhabitants who were already there, which in a nutshell sums up what Zionism has been over the last sixty years in the land called Palestine.

Would Israel be safe if Iran obtained nuclear weapons? That’s an existential question. For no one knows the answer. Iran claims that it has no intention of building a nuclear weapon and it would never use one against other living human beings. At the same time they have expressed their complete opposition to the existence of “a national Jewish homeland in the former state of Palestine”. Again it’s tricky stuff. Perhaps if Israel weren’t borne so unjustly and barbarically and out of so much bloodshed at the expense of another people, Iran and other Middle Eastern countries wouldn’t be so angry and Israel wouldn’t have to be so afraid, defensive and assertive.

[Personally I’ve been to all three countries and seen it all firsthand. It is not merely hearsay as some loudly contend but experience which informs these views. Jews do live comfortably and relatively free in Iran. At least as free and comfortable as Iranian Muslims do. On the other side of the coin, Palestinians live under what could be easily called extreme fascist control and at times concentration camp-like circumstances in many parts of Israel and Palestine under an iron fist of Jewish-Israeli rule. It is more than heartbreaking. Picture the poorest of poor African countries, now add a giant cement wall and barbed wire fences caging them in, along with the addition of Israeli troops carrying machine guns surrounding them on all sides AND no access to running water of any kind that they can control themselves. Again it is more than heartbreaking and speaks volumes about why the Iranian people might just be a bit angry at how their Muslim brethren are being treated. It is also no small testament to the morals and fortitude of the Iranian people that out of all the countries in the Middle East, they are one of the last holdouts who still refuse to cave or compromise their basic values in return for being allowed to suckle the corporate breasts of the most powerful country in the modern world.]

To get back to the point, will we one day see a world where the powers that be in Washington and the West trip over themselves to publicly praise and guffaw over the bravery and gallantry of the Iranian people and their commitment to freedom and human rights? Maybe. One day. It really depends on one of two things: Either, one: the Iranian people find a way to eventually free themselves from being bullied and dominated by the current Rome of the modern world, The United States of America and it’s “allies”, and create true economic and political freedom as a nation — think China. The Chinese are not a free people; in fact they really ARE communists. But you don’t see them being bossed around and controlled like puppets on a string by the U.S. as the Iranian government presently is (think of the so-called “sanctions”, in reality a euphemism for what is known as economic terrorism). The reason is because the United States is afraid of direct military confrontation with China, and two, the U.S. needs their money more than they care about the Chinese peoples’ freedom or liberty. If Iran ever gains a strong economic foothold for itself and becomes competitive in the world, the U.S. will do a 180 degree turn in its views on Iran. The other option would be if the Iranian people are ever successful in their slow and steady quest for true freedom and democracy. Right now they live in a “not so free” country — the only openly and admittedly “Theocratic” government left on earth — though one could argue that China is a “Secular Theocracy”; not to mention the more obvious theocratic states like Saudi controlled Arabia and Afghanistan et al. Only future history will tell.

Another people in the BIGGER picture who are currently suffering from being demonized as being terrorists and general threats to freedom and liberty by the West are almost any and all “Muslims”, especially in the United States and especially in Middle America, where the word Islam is nearly synonymous with “terrorism” to the average person. Just having brown skin in fact nearly uniformly renders a person either a “terrorist” or an “illegal immigrant” in today’s Middle America. Now that may be an unfair stereotype. But if it is, let Middle America show that to be the case. We in the North and the coastal states will surely be more than happy to express our relief and our sincerest apologies if they ever do so. It sure doesn’t appear that way from the outside looking in though. Just as it didn’t appear that the United States government was a big fan of Martin Luther King or Nelson Mandela when they were brandishing them as being communists, terrorists, and threats to the safety and security of freedom and democracy.

Other obvious ideas that come to mind regarding these questions are the countries of Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen. All countries where the United States and its military are actively engaged in killing, looting and covert operations in the name of “defeating terrorists” and “saving the ideals of liberty and democracy”. One day if democracy ever flourishes in these nations and they find a way out of their impoverished states or manage to somehow gain an economic or political advantage over more Westernized powers, then it will only be a matter of time that their leaders will be held up and celebrated as valiant heroes and legends the way that Nelson Mandela currently is. It may sound crazy, but we have to remember, again, that this is a man who in the not too distant past was considered a rebel, a criminal, a terrorist, a communist, and a threat to everything freedom loving people the world over stood for. It is only NOW that he is being rebranded by Washington and the mainstream media as the legend that we all know and love.

Of course, the manner in which he achieved his success and his presidency, through non-violent means, diplomacy and civil disobedience are all reasons why it was so easy for all to so easily change the label that they once attached to the man. And THIS is what makes him such a pivotal figure in global politics. He chose NOT to go the way of military action or violence once he was released from prison. Many facts point to the possibility that had he NOT been imprisoned when he was that he was well on his way toward a more violent and military path towards freedom for black Africans. Which is why he was singled out, arrested and imprisoned in the first place.

As well on the list might include countries such as so-called “Saudi Arabia”, Israel and Palestine. They also come to mind in a reverse engineering sort of way. The country that we now commonly call Saudi Arabia is in reality Arabia. As in Lawrence of Arabia. The same Arabia that’s been around for thousands of years. The term “Saudi” refers to the last name of the family that currently acts as the fascist dictators who nefariously control that entire country full of people against their will. Call it a forced monarchy, oligarchy, a fascist state. None of these words really matter. What matters is that the Saudi family has gone so far in their quest to take over the entire country to use it for themselves that they even changed the name of the country. It would be akin to an American president changing the name of this country to BushMerica or ObamAmerica. It’s that dastardly. And it’s been done with the approval, support and military assistance of the United States — who supposedly will do anything to defend the ideals of freedom, liberty and democracy. In truth the United States government only “defends the ideals of freedom, liberty and democracy” when they have something material to gain from a military intervention in said country. These are ideas only, words only, tools of convenience, semantics.

When a rebel group eventually rises up to defeat the Saudi government in order to free the Arabian people and bring true democracy to the region and proves itself to be stronger than the current regime that occupies the country, one can bet that the United States will be the first in line to send weapons and troops to “defend the Saudi Arabian people”. And only AFTER the Saudi family is put down and democracy rules in Arabia will the United States government change its views and start pretending that it’s “always stood for freedom and democracy for the Arabian people”. Just as it now pretends to have always stood for freedom from racist rule for the South African people even though for decades it directly opposed to it.

There are myriad examples of these types of situations all over the world today. Tibet is another that comes to mind.  An easy choice for defending the freedom and liberty of a people IF the powers that be in Washington or other Western nations really cared about such ideals. So too does Myanmar. As do many countries in Africa still. Freedom and democracy are malleable concepts at this time in human history. So too it seems are the ideals that we attach to political figures such as Nelson Mandela when we see an opportunity to use them to our advantage. It isn’t that Mandela wasn’t a noble man of courage and strength, patience and fortitude. He surely was. And more. His ability to forgive in the face of extreme abuse and wickedness was and always will be exemplary. So too was his decision to transform South Africa into a Westernized-like democracy when he gained power and the presidency. But in the bigger picture it is an odd irony that President Hu Jintao of communist China is just as celebrated when visiting the United States — black tie dinners and 21 gun salutes and all — as Nelson Mandela is today in America. The two men and what they represent couldn’t be more different. And yet from the outside looking in it does not appear that the American government or The White House recognizes this fact, one that seems to be so obvious to the rest of the world. Along with the manner in which Mandela was viewed and treated by the United States for thirty years prior to his success in South Africa, this makes it difficult to ascertain how truly sincere all this fanfare over the Mandela legacy really is.

 



Like this:

Like Loading...
Uncategorized Apartheid, Carter, Considered communist terrorist United States, Kissinger, Nelson Mandela, Nixon, ronald reagan, Saudi family dictatorship over Arabia, South Africa, U.S. Presidents

article 2019-04-29 124622_12.html

June 9, 2004
There was this moment when someone was speaking about Reagan and how he asked him how he managed to stay so calm amid all the insanity of his job as president. And his answer was that he was always used to being in these crazy situations and looking back to whoever was with him in the room for support. And then one day, he decided to look up instead and look to God for support. And from that day on he felt all the support he would ever need.

So tonight as I was resting in bed, ready to fall asleep, I too looked up to God for support.
An amazing talk with God last night. I’m talking like amazing. this knowing. This grand feeling

Ray Charles has passed on.

Like this:

Like Loading...
Uncategorized Labels: looking to God, ray charles dies, ronald reagan, transcendence diaries

A private little world for me… a private little world for you. The online journals and musings of singer-songwriter author and activist Ed Hale. The Transcendence Diaries have been posting regularly online since 2001. Comments are always welcomed. And so are YOU.

Recent Posts

  • World War III Watch — Week Of May 24 to June 6 2023
  • Rest In Peace Big Man In Black
  • America Has Only One Political Party Left — What Happened to Republicans
  • The Great Divide Between the Religious And The Divine
  • What Language Do African Americans Speak? Ebonics Versus African American Vernacular Versus Standard English
  • At Its Core Royalty Is An Attempt To Legitimize Human Abominations and Those Who Commit Them – But Does It Work?
  • DNA from 25,000-year-old pendant reveals woman who wore it — But Not So Much
  • World War III Watch — May 2 – 24, 2023
  • New Mind-Reading Machine That Turns Peoples’ Thoughts Into Text Invented
  • What a Better World This Would Be

Receive Transcendence Diaries Updates

   
 

Subscribe

* indicates required
  
  
  
    Email Format    
 
  
  
 
       
   
   

Join the Ed Hale Mailing List

Ask Ed Hale a Question

Follow Ed Hale Online

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Spotify
  • YouTube
  • Apple

To Follow & Like us

RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Facebook
fb-share-icon
Twitter
Visit Us
Follow Me
Tweet
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Share

Follow Ed Hale on Twitter

My Tweets

Ed Hale on Facebook

Ed Hale on Facebook

Listen to Ed Hale on Spotify

Tags

Abraham Hicks ed hale and the transcendence activism America American imperialism Avatar avatar course China Consciousness Donald Trump ed hale facebook Federal Reserve finding God gaza god intuition Iran Iraq islam Israel itunes living in new york Music music video music videos new album New World Order new york palestine peace politics Relationships Religion Russia social media songs songwriting syria the adventures of Fishy Transcendence transcendence diaries Ukraine United States World War III

Categories

  • Academics
  • Activism
  • Alternative History
  • America at War
  • American Terrorism
  • Ancient History
  • Anthropology
  • Archeology
  • Art and Entertainment
  • Being an Artist
  • Black Lives Matter
  • black people
  • Business and Entrepreneurship
  • Civil Rights
  • Consciousness Exploration and Expansion
  • Consumer Protection
  • Cosmology
  • Current Events
  • Economics
  • Environment
  • Evolution
  • Film and Movies
  • Friends and Family
  • Gender Issues
  • Gun violence Gun Laws
  • Health and Wellness
  • Human Rights
  • Iran
  • Israel/Palestine
  • Just Published
  • Language
  • Life Hacks
  • Literature
  • Love Sex Romance
  • Metaphysics
  • Music
  • Music Videos
  • Musical Instruments & Gear
  • Nature
  • New World Order
  • Paranormal and Supernatural
  • Personal Expression Age
  • Personal Life
  • Physics
  • Politics and Government
  • Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Race Racial and Racism
  • Religion and Spirituality
  • Science
  • Social Media
  • songwriting
  • Struggling artist lifestyle working for the man
  • Technology
  • Television
  • Terrorism
  • Uncategorized
  • Wealth Finance and Investing
  • World Affairs
  • World War III

Recent Comments

  • Ed Hale on Two More Executed In Iran This Morning For Protesting For Freedom & Equality — What We Can Do To Help
  • Ziba on Two More Executed In Iran This Morning For Protesting For Freedom & Equality — What We Can Do To Help
June 2023
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« May    

Archives

  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • September 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • June 2010
  • December 2009
  • September 2009
  • April 2009
  • January 2009
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • May 2007
  • September 2006
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • April 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • May 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • August 2002
  • July 2002
  • January 2002
  • December 2001
  • September 2001
  • April 218

Subscribe

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

The Transcendence Diaries is a property of Transcendent Media Group LLC (c) (p) TM 2001

Idealist by NewMediaThemes

%d bloggers like this: